Workshop Paper
·
October 2023
·
Paris, France
·
DEI Scholar · EUR 900
Deep Learning Framework using Sparse Diffusion MRI for Diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia
Abhishek Tiwari ·
Ananya Singhal ·
Saurabh J. Shigwan ·
Rajeev Kumar Singh
Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, Delhi NCR, India
BIC @ ICCV 2023
·
BioImage Computing Workshop, ICCV · Paris, France
Abstract
Standard clinical dMRI for dementia diagnosis requires 40+ gradient directions — scans too long for agitated or cognitively impaired FTD patients. We present a Swin-Transformer framework that recovers diagnostic-quality FA, AxD, and MD diffusion maps from only 5–21 directions, enabling 50%+ scan time reduction while preserving FTD-specific white matter biomarkers identified via TBSS on the NIFD dataset.
Motivation
- Frontotemporal Dementia affects ~15–22 per 100,000 people and is the most common early-onset dementia after AD — yet it takes on average 3+ years to correctly diagnose due to behavioral symptoms mimicking psychiatric disorders.
- Diffusion MRI provides white matter microstructure biomarkers that distinguish FTD from healthy controls and other dementias, but standard protocols demand 40+ gradient directions → prolonged scans impractical for cognitively impaired, agitated patients.
- Linear least squares (LLS) tensor fitting degrades severely below ~20 directions; a learning-based approach is needed to unlock clinically feasible sparse-dMRI protocols for FTD screening.
- A model achieving diagnostic accuracy from 5–21 directions could make dMRI-based FTD screening accessible in resource-limited settings and for patients who cannot tolerate full-protocol scans.
Framework
Pipeline: b=0 + sparse b=1000 DWI (5 or 21 directions) → Patch Partition (16×8 input) → 5 Swin Transformer Blocks with varied window/shift sizes → 6 parallel Dense Layers predicting diffusion tensor components (Dxx, Dxy, Dyy, Dxz, Dyz, Dzz) → FA, AxD, MD maps → TBSS analysis on NIFD white matter skeleton → FTD vs. healthy classification.
Contributions
- First demonstration that sparse dMRI (5–21 gradient directions) is sufficient for reliable FTD diagnosis — reducing scan time by 50%+ while preserving diagnostic white matter biomarkers validated on the NIFD dataset.
- Swin-Transformer adapted for sparse DTI parameter estimation: shifted-window multi-head self-attention captures local voxel correlations across patch boundaries, enabling a single model to generalise across differing direction counts.
- Physics-informed loss function enforcing positive-definiteness and biophysical coherence in estimated diffusion tensors — preventing implausible anisotropy values at extreme sparse regimes (5 directions).
- Voxel-wise TBSS analysis on NIFD mapping FTD-specific white matter degradation in the uncinate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus — two tracts known to degenerate early in FTD — providing interpretable tract-level biomarkers from sparse acquisitions.
Results
41 directions (full protocol): Proposed method matches ground truth FA, AxD, and MD maps and is comparable to full LLS fitting — validating reconstruction quality before testing sparse regimes.
21 directions: Proposed method outperforms LLS and Transformer-DTI. FA structure well-preserved at half the standard directions.
5 directions: Proposed surpasses both baselines. LLS produces severe artefacts; our model recovers clean diffusion maps.
Error Analysis
Boxplot comparisons of all six diffusion tensor components (Dxx, Dxy, Dyy, Dxz, Dyz, Dzz) across methods. Proposed method consistently achieves lower error distributions, with tighter interquartile ranges than LLS and Transformer-DTI — most notably at the extreme sparse regime of 5 directions.
5 directions: Per-component error distributions. Proposed shows tightest spread across all 6 tensor components; LLS error variance is markedly higher.
21 directions: All methods converge closer to ground truth, but Proposed retains a measurable accuracy advantage over both LLS and Transformer-DTI.
TBSS Analysis
Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) on NIFD (FTD patients vs. healthy controls) identifies statistically significant white matter FA reductions at p<0.05. Proposed method recovers the same significant voxel clusters as ground truth from as few as 5 directions — unlike LLS which fails to replicate FTD-specific degeneration patterns at sparse regimes.
Cingulum (axial): Rows show 21-direction and 5-direction reconstructions. FA reductions in the cingulum bundle are preserved from sparse data — a key FTD biomarker tract.
Uncinate Fasciculus (coronal): Temporal lobe white matter degradation linked to frontal-temporal disconnection in FTD. Proposed recovers the spatial signature from sparse acquisitions.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{tiwari2023ftd,
title = {Deep Learning Framework using Sparse Diffusion MRI
for Diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia},
author = {Tiwari, Abhishek and Singhal, Ananya and
Shigwan, Saurabh J. and Singh, Rajeev Kumar},
booktitle = {BioImage Computing Workshop, ICCV 2023},
address = {Paris, France},
year = {2023}
}